We'll start with "Did Neanderthals and modern man really co-exist?" And if they did, was there, well, fraternizing? According to one recent study, "Theories about when the last Neanderthals walked the Earth may have to be revised, according to a study that suggests they became extinct in their last refuge in Spain much earlier than previously thought, from 35,000 years ago to nearly 50,000." A bit here about the study.
Fast forward to modern cave/cubicle dwellers. "Up to 80 percent of time spent online at work is ‘wasted,’ according to study." Is anyone surprised? And why the quotes around wasted?
Meanwhile, from the Department of Egregious Lawyerly Overreach, "Games Workshop ignores decades of sci-fi history, says they own 'space marines.' " Space marines have been in SF almost from the dawn of the genre -- but at Games Workshop's complaint, Amazon stopped selling the novel Spots the Space Marine. Happily, at the intervention of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (among others), Amazon reversed this action. See: "Trademark Bully Thwarted: Spots the Space Marine Back Online."
If ignorance (and an inability to Google) was Games Workshop's excuse, well, they're not alone. The Halo game series owes a huge debt to the Larry Niven novel Ringworld. And because I respect intellectual property, you'll have to click through to a hilarious cartoon on the subject.
That's enough for one post about metaphorical things going boom. How about some real booms? And some straight science? I'm glad you asked. Following up on North Korea's recent third A-test, here's "How to Find a Nuclear Explosion in North Korea."
From NASA: artist conception |
Sort of like how trailer parks attract tornadoes.
Depending on your tastes and how you feel about The Hollow Men, we can call that going out with a bang or with a whimper.
2 comments:
"Given that the last big space rock to affect the Earth was also over Russia (the Tunguska Event, in 1908), one wonders if that country has a big bull's eye painted on it."
Or maybe it's just REALLY REALLY big, accounting for 10% of our planet's land area and 3.3% of the total area.
Hi Andy,
What you say is, of course, correct -- but it only means that Russia is more likely than any other specific country to get hit. Russia shouldn't be more likely than Everyplace Else (the remaining ~97% of the planet) to get smacked. :-)
- Ed
Post a Comment