When it rains, it pours |
Some in Washington officialdom -- to the level of the Director of the FBI! -- assert that a solution to our national-security problems is to add insecure back doors to Internet encryption protocols. That strategy is intended to assure government access to terrorist communications. These hobbled, vulnerable protocols will be safe, we're assured, for the rest of us.
We're to believe the bad guys could never figure out how, or coerce someone, to open the back doors. After all, it's not like someone just stole personal, in many cases compromising, data on >21 million current and former federal employees and contractors. (Oh, wait.) So: no. As the authorities seemingly must keep relearning, there are plenty of good hackers out there. Purposefully making the Internet insecure is a horrible idea. See "Encryption with backdoors is worse than useless -- it's dangerous."
Can it be made to tell all? |
Beware ... |
And while you're sweating what might fry your laptop (okay, maybe I'm unable not to intend wordplay), I'll leave you with the unrelated possibility that "Project Will Make Clothes Cool So You Don't Need the AC." DOE estimates that five percent of electricity in the US goes to running air conditioners. Smart, temperature-modulating clothing -- if it comes about -- could make a real difference in power usage. And even better, such tech would abate the thermostat wars in many a household.
2 comments:
On the topic of hacking, I've seen speculation about all our personal systems being hijacked—auto-driving cars, car/truck/landing gear tires deflated, clothing made unbearable hot or cold ... not to mention military equipment. One can think of a rogue hacking teener having a lot of fun at other's expense.
Government's role should be clear. The threats to interstate as well as international commerce and defense could easily be read into our constitution ... even though it doesn't mention software specifically.
Hacking of our cars isn't speculation -- it's been demonstrated. The Washington Post is currently running a series of articles about the topic/threat.
I've yet to see any benefit from putting cars online that merits the risks of having them online. Making cars self-guiding, self-parking, self-braking, etc. doesn't require cars to be on the Internet. Letting passengers surf? That's *not* a sufficient reason.
A personal/historical note: in my first novel, Probe (1991), I made the hacking of a car a plot element. That car had embedded microprocessors, but was NOT online, making the hack a more subtle, longer-in-the-making attack.
Post a Comment